Cover
Statement go plagerisum
Acknoledmen Acknowledgments
abstract Abstract
Ethics within photo journalism and socially concerned (Not sure about what you mean to do with socially concerned. Photography have hasalways been of commercial interest in newspapers and the popular press. This dissertation aims to investigate the use of questionable ethics, planning ( are planning photographers people what do they do)Are you talking about the fact you are reviewing the work of these people reflecting on how their vision and interpretation of their subject matter has impacted upon economical and political events) photographers and photojournalists . throughout time, ( do you need throughout time ……… Focus will be placed on extreme cases, questioning the ethics of their involvement and whether their work has had a detrimental or contribution……focusing on on some of the more extreme cases and whether they were ethically right to get involved with what was going on.
contents page Contents page
list of figures List of figures
intro / thesis Intro / Thesis
Photojournalism Plays a vital role in our global community. within historical parameters have been broken due to the photographic intervention of some photo journalists. Manipulation and reconstruction of circumstances and situations whilst in the field, have produced changed results others in photographs, with This dissertation I aim to analyse the major.dilemma across of ethics within the global spear of photojournalism . The analysis to facilitate a detailed inquiry, the analysis of both past and present photo journalistic events and their methods and reasons for intervention if it was necessary
,
Firstly the ethical matters of images used within the media and the perception of how the images plays the global community views ,Firstly I would like to address the ethical usage of a image or photograph. The presentation of these images and the context within they are placed, will play a strong role in forming global community views. If the perception the of the image is the responsibility of the photographer, what other elements are his responsibility ?the staging of his image within the media framework may have a detrimental or positive swaye. How carefully should the image be presented and what 'truths' should it tell.
Secondly, the best (At best the analysis of the misrepresentation of the 1980 Sudanese famine )and finally,viewing ethical standards within modern-day photojournalism . The (these)examples i am focusing on( do you need focusing on as we know you are) show the how the value of the photographic image is sometimes abducted( I think I know what you mean…………are you saying the image is selected to represent a story…. Not sure who is being self preserved the photographer or their subject) for self preservation purposes. While trying to help ( represent the plight) of various cultures,victims, and societies ,sectors of the photographic world tend to lose sight of humanity, and ethics,discriminating against the victims even further in the way they stage their subject matter. As ( remove as) photographers gain notoriety by profiteering from human misery, charities use photos of global inequality to build fund( should it be funding). Unfortunately the general population do not know( are unaware) of the fate of the victims that appear within the pictures. Pictures that ( exploit them to make money)are exploited to make money. Are we being forced to create a syndrome called compassion fatigue?. It is contended that At whatever fruitful change of our picture society must incorporate those voices of the people in the developing world.(do you mean…however fruitful the change, in relation to the picture composition, that in turn would possibly lead to financial benefits for both the photographer and the subject he is representing, is it not inherent to incorporate the true voices of the people from the developing world, not the staged/ selected usage of imagery.
The progressively mediatised ( media led ) society we live in (inhabit) today, leads us to be commanded ( suppresses or ability to think for ourselves. We have become reliant , on the media thinking for us, the images processed, form a completed view an summary of an event.viewToward ,reliant upon the processing of almost( The utilisation of images) utilization images ,created to ( take out utilisation images created to ) sway our view of different global communities, of other different cultures ,( how about … Thus increasing the profiteering agenda of the media) toincrease the profiteering agenda media ,that controls a majority of photojournalists. Notions from claiming objectivity, Furthermore induction in ( into .)the photographic have since ( disappeared a long time ago) a long time ago disappeared. In any case we ( surely we are discerning enough to sense the difference between ' the real' and fake)still spot our sense for ‘the real’ pictures.
This dissertation (by utising selected ethical dilemmas within this dissertation, I aim to highlight how the photographic image has been prostitued.will utilise a significant number of cases of ethical dilemmas though the photographic image
,What’s more thought examine the part of photography, ‘the real’ inside today’s society. It will begin with A discourse of the thinking to the introductory shift again towards the genuine. This shift primarily stemmed starting with postmodernism and the networking. Postmodernism managed for those ticket of never finishing reference and the trepidation over postmodern society might have been that this never completion reference intended that every one grip around truth needed disappeared.
There might have been An wish will return on something All the more stable Furthermore basic: ‘the real’? because of developments Previously, engineering Also developments to photography, the new quick evolving commonplace picture prompted our connections and feelings turning into mediatised. We re-live occasions and encounters through images, which prompts An passing of the genuine. We keep in mind those picture instead of the off chance. Photographers off with attempt Furthermore give back of the purely spellbinding photography starting with the times in the recent past the impostor referencing of postmodernism. This thesis will take a gander at how exactly for these photographers endeavored should speak to the true Furthermore also during how a couple chose will assume around for the representational of the true. Ansel Adams, to example, accepted over basically attempting will make a genuine inconsistency representational of the scene he might have been photographing. He endeavored should indicate view at its practically common What's more realistic, for no visual control alternately guile. Andreas. Gursky on the other hand began with this view but soon started changing this representation with digital editing so that it was no longer a true representation. Some photographers began attempting to create purely descriptive photography but could not escape referencing earlier work. Justin Partyka’s work The East Anglians, for example cannot be described as anything else but descriptive photography. However, his reference to Robert Frank’s The Americans in his title, had led him to fall into the postmodernism trap. Can you provide an account without analysis when it comes to photography?
‘’Many factors come into a play at the moment of squeezing the shutter. Does the photographer have the consent of the person he is photographing? If the person is not capable of giving their consent (if they do not speak the same language, or are injured for example, or even dead), is it appropriate to continue photographing?
If the person in the photograph is in obvious distress or danger, should the photographer put down the camera? Are there circumstances in which the photographer should provide help or assistance? If the photograph is taken, after all these considerations, who will see it? How will its future dissemination affect the people in the photograph?’’
COOMES, Phil. 2011. “A question of ethics: Photographers in the spotlight.†BBC In Pictures, 22 December [online]. Available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/in-pictures-16282985 [accessed 7 November 2016].
CHAPTER 1
A picture may be generally seen through pre-constructed prejudices. Viewers are to trust that what they see is the To. John Berger (1988) says that, same time each picture speaks to an approach for seeing, the observation alternately appreciation from claiming an picture generally relies upon unique approaches of perceiving. We decipher an occasion utilizing our memory of a comparable off chance (Rick Rohde, in Wolfram Hartman et al 2003). It takes after that, Likewise An picture is imbued with the viewer’s longing on interpret its meaning, the seeing for its setting generally relies on preconceived mental pictures in the manifestation for stereotypes.
pictures would outlined should correspond or to ‘tell us something’ they camwood be translated as a social development and, thus, Similarly as reflecting those photographer’s decision. Viewers scan the picture for signs for their history Furthermore context, and the implications from claiming this decision. Conversely, pictures educate us nothing to “they need aid naturally mute†(Peter burke 2001, p. 34). I contend that pictures talk a dialect that we camwood best see all the through our identity or understanding of the connection as we recognize it, and also through those composed data furnished. Thus, photojournalism is not regarding great alternately terrible portraits Be that as around if they tell an exact story. Yet, same time a story might make accurate, it might still make translated wrongly.
The widespread belief that photographs do not require an explanation in the form of words but that they speak for themselves is therefore wrong. Of course, words can be misleading too. Like photographs, they are open to interpretation. We are not only cognitively but also emotionally influenced by photographs. Moreover, when looking at images, we memorise them in a way that is shaped by our cultural perception and education of what we see. Starting with the distribution of colonial photography, European consumers have been exposed to largely negative images from different corners of Africa. The sheer abundance of pejorative images has shaped our perception of the developing world. For example, we correlate photographs of black children in emergency appeals with social stereotypes of Africa and Africans mentally stored. The associations are those of hunger and starvation – in short: of prolonged human tragedy. Arguably, as many people in the northern hemisphere see it, such tragedy has become normality on the ‘black continent’, or Conrad’s ‘heart of darkness’.
The sustained stereotypicisation of Africans is politically motivated and serves a variety of agendas, including that of charities working in emergency situations. We are expected, and our Western mind purposefully manipulated into believing what we see (Colin Jacobson 2002). Since the outbreak of conflict in sub-Saharan Sudan in 1982 its grim history has been providing photojournalists with ethical and political challenges. In his book “Underexposed†(2002) Jacobson published an impressive collection of an extraordinary set of images showing how photographs can be made to lie. One of the most shocking images was taken by Wendy Wallace in the Red Sea Hills during the Sudanese famine of 1984. It depicts a British television crew photographing an emaciated child who had been brought out to sit in the dirt precisely for that image.
Figure 1: Red Sea Hills 1984. In 1984, famine was afflicting many Sudanese, including the nomads of the northeast, whose grazing lands had dried up. Nomadic Hadendowa tribes-people came out of their traditional areas to see work and food in the towns. They set up a temporary camp by the side of the main paved road from Khartoum to Port Sudan. The camp was mainly inhabited by women, children and the elderly; the men were away looking for casual work. When a British television crew and accompanying UNICEF staff member appeared at the camp, the people brought out one of their most afflicted children for the cameras to demonstrate the hardships they faced.
(Wendy Wallace)
the glorification of an iamge can also mean that we then forget about the issue at hand .for example ,Jodi biebers portrait of bibi aisha succededover thousands of images to receive the 2011 world press photo of the year .however whilst as an iamge the photograph sits alone ,how much does it actually tell us / as campdell has suggestd :the portrait more ofteb than not decontexulizeese and depoliticses the situation being depicted ,leaving it to accomponing captions ,headlines and texts to rempory anchor meaning .’campbell 2001}if we then apply this theory to the world press photo ,is it biebers image that is inspiring the understanding of the world ,or the caption thaht will sit alongside it .the viers needs to take a moment to asses weather ,after vierng og the portrait and after the intal shock of the mutilate face has passed ,we think of the oppression of afgan women at the hands of the taliband of instead the drama of the portiat and the power of her stare ,the colours within the image .in the case ,has the astetical and emotional anchor created a glorifaction resulting in the award that reduces of qualifies our understanding of the sotry behind it ? An argument could be made that ,in fact ,the Haiti earthquake that killed hundreds of thaousands of people was a story with a more justifiable winner of the yar .however ,Jodi biebers portairt is considerd more relivent to our western culture .the image was conciderd more relivent to our western culture as the article featured in time ran with headline ‘whats happens if we leave afganistan’as such this then justifies the us military presence and occupationof afganistan and directly links to our own culture .even though the Haiti earthquake had an impact on hundreds of thousands of people ,this was a natural disaster and aside from sending aid it did not affect us dicrectly and thus it was deemed less importain to our western culture .
CHAPTER 2
However this is just one way that we can asses the impact of the world press photo .moeller also states that :simple pictures ,emotional pictures .pictures that can be distilled into a plain and unmistakable message can drill into the minds and hearts of there audiences ,†(moeller,1999)in this regrd ,the glorification and celibation of images of conflict and disaster can have the most positive of effects . the world press photo also has the protencal to bring forgotten conflicts to the forefrount of our minds . an example of this could be robin moyers 1982 world press photo of the year ;an image of a massacre of palestinines by christian phalanagist in the sadra and shatila refuge camps in lebanon .
the image itself does not bear up to assessment regarding tradional aestehetics ;the composition is simple and the framing could be considered imperfect because of the legs and body in the bottom right of the image being cropped out. there are heavy shadows in the image that detract form the detail .however ,despite finding fault with the technical aspects of the iamge ,it is the emtive power of the photograph that hapled propel it to the industry top prize that year .in relation to moeller ‘s quote adove ,this image is simple ,with a clear emotional anchor . the dobies and blood embed the image into the minds and heart of the audience whilst also fulfilling the purpose of a news iamge ,toinform us of an event in a news context
exposed to largely negative images from different corners of Africa. The sheer abundance of pejorative images has shaped our perception of the developing world. For example, we correlate photographs of black children in emergency appeals with social stereotypes of Africa and Africans mentally stored. The associations are those of hunger and starvation – in short: of prolonged human tragedy. Arguably, as many people in the northern hemisphere see it, such tragedy has become normality on the ‘black continent’, or Conrad’s ‘heart of darkness’.
The sustained stereotypicisation of Africans is politically motivated and serves a variety of agendas, including that of charities working in emergency situations. We are expected, and our Western mind purposefully manipulated into believing what we see (Colin Jacobson 2002). Since the outbreak of conflict in sub-Saharan Sudan in 1982 its grim history has been providing photojournalists with ethical and political challenges. In his book “Underexposed†(2002) Jacobson published an impressive collection of an extraordinary set of images showing how photographs can be made to lie. One of the most shocking images was taken by Wendy Wallace in the Red Sea Hills during the Sudanese famine of 1984. It depicts a British television crew photographing an emaciated child who had been brought out to sit in the dirt precisely for that image. Figure 1: Red Sea Hills 1984. In 1984, famine was afflicting many Sudanese, including the nomads of the northeast, whose grazing lands had dried up. Nomadic Hadendowa tribes-people came out of their traditional areas to see work and food in the towns. They set up a temporary camp by the side of the main paved road from Khartoum to Port Sudan. The camp was mainly inhabited by women, children and the elderly; the men were away looking for casual work. When a British television crew and accompanying UNICEF staff member appeared at the camp, the people brought out one of their most afflicted children for the cameras to demonstrate the hardships they faced.
(Wendy Wallace)
The widespread belief that photographs do not require an explanation in the form of words but that they speak for themselves is wrong. Words can be misleading and inteprited in many ways , simmalar to photographs. We are mentally but also emotionally influenced by photographs. when looking at images, we log them mentally in a methord that is moulded by our cultural perception and education of what we see. Starting with the distribution of colonial photography, European consumers have been exposed to largely negative images from different corners of Africa.The sheer abandance of pejorative images has shaped our perception of the developing world.For example,we correlate photographs of black children in emergency appeals with social stereotypes of Africa and Africans mentally stored.The associations are those of hunger and starvation in short:of prolonged human tragedy. Arguably,as many people in the northern hemisphere see it, such tragedy has become normality on the ‘black continent’,or Conrad’s ‘heart of darkness.
The sustained stereotypicisation of Africans is politically motivated and serves a variety of agendas, including that of charities working in emergency situations. We are expected, and our Western mind purposefully manipulated into believing what we see (Colin Jacobson 2002). Since the outbreak of conflict in sub-Saharan Sudan in 1982 its grim history has been providing photojournalists with ethical and political challenges. In his book “Underexposed†(2002) Jacobson published an impressive collection of an extraordinary set of images showing how photographs can be made to lie. One of the most shocking images was taken by Wendy Wallace in the Red Sea Hills during the Sudanese famine of 1984. It depicts a British television crew photographing an emaciated child who had been brought out to sit in the dirt precisely for that image.
Figure 1
‘’documentry ia a little like hoor movies,putting a face ofn fear and transforming thret into fanticy,into imagery.’’ Martha rosler
The infant in the photograph though-provoking Western perceptions of well-known stereotypes of the developing world. Colin Jacobson (2002) knows that this photograph was used by UNICEF for advertising purposes, a circumstance that carries serious implications. Heavy media coverage of man-made and natural events in developing countries and the lack of positive stories and images frequently reinforce well-known Western stereotypes of the majority world. The perception of Africans as helpless victims is notoriously emphasised in images of anonymous abandoned children. A suffering and vulnerable child on its own offers “strong familiar pictures†to the Western eye while, at the same time, abasing a frail human being into a media victim (Colin Jacobson 2002, p. 92)
‘’…victimhood (the victimization,by someone elses camera ,of helpless persons.’’
CHAPTER 3
The Code of Ethics goes on to detail what is and is not acceptable in professional photojournalism. Though the standards may seem fairly crystalized, every day there are challenging borderline cases. Considering that photography itself is barely 150 years old, one might wonder how these particular ethical guidelines came to be, and how they may be evolving over time.
As a topic, 'ethics in photojournalism' is difficult to approach, or even to define. In order to ask questions such as, "What were photojournalistic ethics in the past," "what are photojournalistic ethics today," and "what will photojournalistic ethics look like in the future," one must first carefully define the concepts of both ‘ethics’ and ‘photojournalism.’
“It seems some photographers can’t resist the temptation to aesthetically enhance their images during post-processing either by removing small details to ‘clean up’ an image, or sometimes by excessive toning that constitutes a material change to the image. Both types of retouching clearly compromise the integrity of the image. Consequently, the jury rejected 22 percent of those entries that had reached the penultimate round of the contest and were therefore not considered for prizes.†wrote Lars Boering, managing director, World Press Photo
photojournalistic ethics might encompass the choices an individual photographer makes while shooting. For example, should a war photographer put down his cameras in order to help an injured soldier? If someone asks that his or her photo not be taken, is it ethical to photograph that person anyway? If ethics in photojournalism is about being “faithful and comprehensive,†is intentionally underexposing or poorly focusing unethical? Some of these questions sit on the line between journalistic ethics and professionalism.
Eric Kim Street Photography launched an ethics controversy by running two photographs. One, a prize-winning photo of 15-year-old Haitian Fabienne Cherisma, who was shot and killed by Haitian police after stealing two plastic chairs and three framed pictures in the chaos following the nation’s devastating earthquake last year. The other picture showed the origins of the photo and others like it, a crowd of intent photographers in a group, snapping away at the horrible scene like paparazzi trying to get a good shot of Lindsay Lohan.
Kim agreed that the initial photo is crucial news journalism, but worried that the second photo showed callousness on the part of the photographers, who appeared to be exploiting a tragedy.
Judge for yourself. Photojournalism, like medicine, law enforcement, social work, government leadership, and many other professions, is an ethically-conflicting job by nature, because it requires dispassionate calculations in situations where non-professionals would be overwhelmed with emotion. This is purely utilitarian conduct. The pictures need to be taken. The public is served by vivid illustrations of the world and events. Competent and effective pictures require pragmatism, opportunism and professional cool that will often seem repugnant to observers. That is unavoidable, and fully justified by the importance of the work.
The Ethical Callousness of Photojournalists
when doe photjuanlisum become explotitive ?
‘’its both flattery and warming’’
‘’liberal documentary improves us to look in the face of deprivation.’’
‘’its argument have been twisted into gwenerations of coaition of man’’
‘The liberal documentary assuages any stirrings of
conscience in its viewers the way scratching relieves an itch and simultaneously
reassures them about their relative wealth and social position; especially
the latter, now that even the veneer of social concern has dropped away
from the upwardly mobile and comfortable social sectors.’’
‘’ Documentary testifies, finally, to the bravery or
(dare we name it?) the manipulativeness and savvy of the photographer, who
entered a situation of physical danger, social restrictedness, human decay, or
combinations of these and saved us the trouble. Or who, like the astronauts,
entertained us by showing us the places we never hope to go.’’
‘’we’re looking for images that shine an uncompromising light on crucial issues that transcend borders, that transcend religions,images the provoke us to step up and do something – in other word, to act’’ (klein 2010 :online ghetty images ) Jonathan klein )
conclusion
In sum, what we need is a reformed image culture that challenges culturally-induced attitudes about the developing world. This reform must be initiated by both the media and charities. They can show us, every day, that there can be change. However, changing stereotypical attitudes about the majority world entails a process of re-education – first by charities and media editors, and consequently by consumers. Charities can redirect our eyes by showing true and positive images, which enables us to see the world in a different way. The goal is to minimise the ‘self’ and increase the awareness of other cultures. This reform could give rise to a new consumer generation, enlightened by a more balanced view of events in the developing world. The time-consuming but worthwhile transformation process of the consumer generation defines an exciting subject for further research.
The reformation of our image culture, however, faces two main challenges. News editors might refuse to abandon traditional portrayals of events in developing countries. Charities, on the other hand, might face a real challenge in selling positive images to consumers with preconceived ideas about the nature of images in emergency appeals. Worldwide projects like Drik and, arguably, kijiji*Vision have a real potential to provide a more balanced picture of the world. They can make sure that “the grotesque lack of reality – that the majority of the world is one block of disadvantaged, poverty-striken people – is not the legacy of our generation†(Mark Goldring, in VSO Press release 2002).
concultion
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Documentary Sources
Save the Children Fund (SCF), Image guidelines. Focus on Images. (1995, revised edition).
Voluntary Services Overseas (VSO), The Live Aid Legacy: The developing world through British Eyes – A research report. January, 2002 [http://vso.org.uk/media/rel_liveaidlegacy.htm].
Books and Articles
John Berger, Ways of Seeing. London: BBC/Harmondsworth: Penguin (1972).
John Berger, ‘Where are we?’ in: David L. Strauss, Between the Eyes: Essays on Photography and Politics. New York: Aperture (2003), pp. vii-xv.
Robert H. Bremner, Giving, Charity and Philanthropy in History. London: Transaction (1994).
Peter Burke, Eyewitnessing. The Use of Images as Historical Evidence. New York: Cornell University Press (2001).
Erica Burman, ‘Innocents abroad: Western Fantasies of Childhood and the Iconography of Emergencies’, Disasters, vol. 18:3, 1994, pp.238-53.
Ken Burnett (ed.), Advertising by Charities. London: The Directory of Social Change (1986).
David Campbell, Salgado and the Sahel. Documentary Photography and the Imaging of Famine’, in: Francois Debrix and Cynthia Weber (eds.), Rituals of Mediation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press (2003), pp.69 – 96.
Charities Aid Foundation (CAF) and the National Council for Voluntary Organisations (NCVO), Inside Research – Charitable giving in 2002, Issue 19, August, 2003.
D.J. Clark, The Production of a Contemporary Famine Image: The Image Economy, Indigenous Photographers and the Case of Mechanic Philipos. DRAFT-PAPER, December, 2003.
Howard Davies, ‘Accountability in the Media’. Forced Migration Review, December 2000, vol. 9, p. 37.
Nikki van der Gaag and Cathy Nash, Images of Africa – The UK Report. Oxford: Oxfam (1987).
Brent Harris, Photography in colonial discourse: the making of ‘the other’ in southern Africa, c. 1850 – 195’, in: Wolfram Hartman Jeremy Silvester, Patricia Hayes (eds.), The Colonising Camera: Photography in the Making of Namibian History. Athens OH: Ohio University Press (1999), pp. 20 – 24.
Gabi Hinsliff, Famine photos are a turnoff, warns Short; ‘Heartbreak images can be counter- productive’, Daily Mail, London, May 29, 1998, p.19.
Colin Jacobson (ed.), Underexposed: Pictures of the 20th Century they didn’t want you to see. London: Vision (2002).
Colin Jacobson, Independent Magazine and Reportage, in: Ken Light, Witness of our time. Working lives of documentary photographers. London: Smithonian Institution Press (2000), p.178 – 182.
53
Arthur Kleinman and Joan Kleinman, The Appeal of Experience; The Dismay of Images: Cultural Appropriations of suffering in our Time. In: Arthur Kleinman, Veena Das, and Margaret Lock, Social Suffering, Berkeley: University of California Press (1997).
Liisa Malkki, ‘Speechless Emissaries: Refugees, Humanitarianism, and Dehistoricization’, Cultural Anthropology, vol. 11:3, 1996, pp.377 – 404.
Michael Maren, The Road to Hell. New York: Free Press (1997).
Paul Martin, ‘I’m really sorry I didn’t pick the child up’, London Mail, Sunday, 16 October, 1994, p. 40.
William J.T. Mitchell, Picture Theory: Essays on Verbal and Visual Representation. University of Chicago Press (1995).
David D. Perlmutter, Photojournalism and Foreign Policy. Icons of Outrage in International Crises. London: Praeger (1998).
Jan N. Pieterse, Europe and its Others, in: D.T. Goldberg and J. Solomos (eds.) The Blackwell Companion to Racial and Ethnic Studies. Chap. I, Oxford: Blackwell (2002).
Kate Quill, ‘Human Nature’, The Times, Tuesday, 15 June, 2004, p. 15.
Rick Rohde, How we See Each Other: Subjectivity, Photography and Ethnography, in: Wolfram Hartman et al., The Colonising Camera: Photography in the Making of Namibian History. Ohio University Press (2003), chap. 14, pp. 188-204.
Edward W. Said, Orientalism. London: Penguin Books (1995).
Susan Sontag, Regarding the Pain of Others. London: Hamish Hamilton (2003).
John Tagg, The Burden of Representation: Essays on Photographies and Histories. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press (1988).
John Taylor, Body Horror. Photojournalism, Catastrophe and War. Manchester University Press (1998).
Bryan Turner, ‘Edward Said: Overcoming Orientalism’, Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 21:1, 2004, pp. 173-177.
Tony Vaux, The Selfish Altruist. Relief Work in Famine and War. London: Earthscan (2001).
Wim Wenders, The Act of Seeing. Essays and Conversations. Faber & Faber (2001).
Paul Williams, ‘Edward Said (1935-2003)’, Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 21:1, 2004, London: SAGE, pp. 169-171.
Newspapers
The Guardian, ‘Guardian Reader Emergency Appeal for Darfur Sudan’, Monday, 14 June, p.26.
The Guardian, ‘The DEC Sudan Emergency Appeal’, Saturday, 24 July, 2004, p. 7
The Independent, ‘Abandoned, starving, desperate’, Friday, 6 August, 2004, p. 2.
The Independent, ‘The Independent Darfur Appeal’, Monday, 9 August, 2004, p. 2.
54
Websites
BBC News online, Charities launch Sudan aid effort, Saturday, 17 July, 2004 [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/3902443.stm].
BBC News online, Sudan web appeal hits record high, Monday, 26 July, 2004 [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/3926743.stm].
BBC News, UK’s Darfur aid efforts praised, Tuesday, 10 August, 2004 [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3552114.stm].
CAF, Charity Trends 2004. June 2004 [http://www.cafonline.org/research/charitytrends04.cfm].
Christian Aid, campaigns, fair trade
[http://www.christian- aid.org.uk/campaign/fairtrad/fairtrad.htm] cited September 2004.
COOMES, Phil. 2011. “A question of ethics: Photographers in the spotlight.†BBC In Pictures, 22 December [online]. Available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/in-pictures-16282985 [accessed 7 November 2016].
Concern’s Approach to Emergencies. March 2002
[http://casy1.concernfast.org/concernnet/docs/Appro_Emergencies.pdf].
Fair-Trade Labelling Organization (FLO) [http://www.fairtrade.net] cited August 2004.
Fiona Dawe, Department for International Development (DIFD): Public Attitudes towards Development – Knowledge and Attitudes Concerning Poverty in Developing Countries. July 2003 [http://www2.dfid.gov.uk/aboutdfid/intheuk/opinion.asp].
Drik [http://www.drik.net/] cited August 2004.
The Fair Trade Federation, Reports on Fair-Trade Trends. [http://www.fairtradefederation.com]
cited August 2004.
Terefa Fufa, Limits of compassion, Thursday, 12 August, 2004
[www.oromia.org/Articles/Limits_of_Compassion_P.htm].
Ruth Gidley, NGOs fail image standards on appeal images, Wednesday, 14 January, 2004 [http://www.alertnet.org/thefacts/reliefresources/107410342375.htm].
The International Crisis Group (ICG) [http://www.crisisweb.org/home/index.cfm] cited August 2004.
The International Fair Trade Association (IFAT)
[http://www.ifat.org/theftomark/ftomarkftlabelling.html] cited August 2004.
kijiji*Vision, [http://www.kijijivision.org/] cited July 2004.
Judith Larner, Are we a nation of Scrooges? The Guardian online, Saturday, 22 November, 2003 [http://www.money.guardian.co.uk/ethicalmoney/story/0,1356,1090625,00.html].
More Riverside London, Powerful exhibition is wake up call to Britain, say UK’s leading aid agencies. [www.morelondon.com/thescoop/press_040617.asp] cited August 2004.
National Geographic [www.news.nationalgeographic.com/] cited August 2004.
New Statesman, The decisive moment, Monday, 26 July, 2004
[http://www.newstatesman.com/site.php3?newTemplate=NSArticle_NS&newTop=Section %3A+Front+Page&newDisplayURN=200407260035].
Panos Pictures [http://www.panos.co.uk/] cited September 2004.
55
The Poynter Institute [http://www.poynter.org/] cited July 2004.
Laura Turney, Ian Law and Debbie Phillips, Institutional Racism in Higher Education Toolkit Project: Building the Anti-Racist HEI Centre for Ethnicity and Racism Studies, 2002 [http:/www.leeds.ac.uk/cers/toolkit/] cited September 2004.
UN News Service, Sudan: World's Worst Humanitarian Crisis Unfolding, Monday, 22 March 2004,
Press Release: United Nations. [http://www.un.org/News/].
VSO, The Live Aid Legacy, Press Release: Wednesday, 7 January, 2002,
[http://www.vso.org.uk/media/rel_liveaidlegacy.htm].
Alex de Waal, ‘Counter-Insurgency on the Cheap’, London Review of Books, Vol. 26: 15, 5 August, 2004, online edition [http://www.lrb.co.uk/v26/n15/waal01_.html].
Dictionaries
The Oxford English Dictionary, Oxford University Press; 5th Indexed edition (December 1, 2002).
Webster Dictionary online [http://www.webster-dictionary.org/definition/photojournalism] cited August 2004.
Wikipedia online library [http://en.wikipedia.org] cited August 2004.
Visual media
DEC – Appeal Broadcast (Video), Sudan Emergency July 2004, ITN appeal Joanna Lumley, [http://www.dec.org.uk/index.cfm/asset_id,437/index.html].
Errol Morris, The Fog of War. Eleven Lessons from the Life of Robert S. McNamara. Documentary (95 min.), Columbia Tristar, (USA 2003).
Picturesque details such as ageing and weathering are familiar enough in photograhs which may otherwiase be poor information,showing nothing .
Visual is essentially pornographic which is to say that it has its end in rapt ,mindless fascination.
In the end ,photography can goad conscience but it can never provide ‘ethical or political knoage .
Documentary photographs in the press rarly stand alone they are almost always accompanied by headlines ,captions ,and stories which guide readers in how view them .
Too many photographs of disgusting events are supposed to reduce audiences to indifferent voyeurs and produce ‘compassion fatgue’.
And how in the end photographic evidence is used to serve group identification rather then any notin of actual or objective truth.
Instead of using photogrphty to reform society ,the press use it to illustrate storie which in turn support views on what it is appropriate to see
In other words ,audience are not simly swamped or embraced by news as a prodect of middle-class culture,but attach or detach themselves from the news wherever they themselves stand .
Jack lacan ethics
Fuco ethics photography
Ducumentry films ethics and standards
Magnam
Body horror jhon terry
Jhon sturrik
Camera work
main body of text
chapter 1