Intentional or not, Jane Austen gave important details about issues of class in her novel, Pride and Prejudice. Many people would learn issues of life and languages that would affect them later on in life. In Jane Austen’s novel, “Pride and Prejudice,” Jane uses issues of class as her theme.
Jane Austen was a dynamic lady of her time. She was conceived in the 18th century into a white collar class family. Her dad had been naturally introduced to a lower class dissimilar to her mother who was naturally introduced to a privileged. This gave her the chance to encounter all classes. Jane’s siblings went onto progress toward becoming men in the military, church, and knighthood. This is delineated in her book of Pride and Prejudice while portraying Elizabeth Bennett’s experiences. Elizabeth Bennett had limit alternatives amid her opportunity yet tested what was expected of her. Elizabeth took after her enthusiasm and societal perspectives. She didn’t let societal rules pick whom she ought to wed. She held up until the point that she discovered love and money.
Elizabeth Bennett was relied upon to wed her initially offer of marriage. She did not marry Mr. Collins as a result of pomposity and mean comprehension. Mr. Bennett was indifferent whether she wedded him or not. Mrs. Bennett was incensed, since she knew that whether anything happened to her dad than Mr. Collins would acquire where they live. Mrs. Bennett had deliberately arranged her little girl’s experiences with certain suitors each for an alternate reason. Elizabeth declining his offer in marriage in these circumstances was unbelievable. This demonstrates Elizabeth has control. This can be supported by the possibility that, “Before she wedded, a young lady had the energy of what Moralists called “her Negative”: the privilege to oppose or even reject the proposition of a suitor.” (Poovey, pg.29) This is a part inversion since men had more power in determining marriages in this general public. Elizabeth seeking after this activity and accept made her come to appear as a dynamic woman. This is a transformative advance for lady.
Elizabeth’s pride makes her be saved and drives her to demonstrate that she is not quite the same as her clamorous more youthful sisters who accept any open door to hit the dance floor with a male (Austen, 26). Elizabeth’s standoffish quality further upsets her from building up an association with Darcy. Darcy keeps on being fascinated by Elizabeth’s appeal and he doesn’t quit seeking after her despite the fact that intemperate pride makes Elizabeth dishearten him from her. In light of Elizabeth’s arrogance Darcy who is for the most part pleasant does however end up noticeably discourteous and haughty to Elizabeth as a barrier instrument. Because of Elizabeth’s haughtiness, Darcy’s certain character is hindered and can just uncover itself amidst the novel (Nardin, 6).
Elizabeth’s pretentious pride impedes her from understanding her companion Charlotte Lucas’ best advantages concerning her want to wed Mr. Collins. Elizabeth “prides herself on being a keen “studier of character,” as Mr. Bingley calls her, however how well does she truly know her great companion Charlotte… ” when she “reacts with surprise and repulsiveness” after hearing that Charlotte needs to wed a man who is “dull”, “affected” and “physically ugly”. Elizabeth’s over the top pride blinds her from perceiving that Charlotte is “very little inspired by men and especially intrigued by marriage” (Moler, 26).
Indeed, Darcy’s unbalanced pride blinds his own ethical judgment and influences his dear companion’s comprehension of what is imperative in a relationship. Darcy who encounters anguishing trouble in his association with Elizabeth at last concedes that just he too had an absence of self – information and obfuscated judgment because of intemperate pride and egotism. Darcy’s self acknowledgment of his extraordinary hubris changes his conduct so that “when he experiences Elizabeth at Pemberly, Darcy is resolved to demonstrate her that his behavior now display genuine thought for others” (Nardin, 11).
Austen’s demeanor towards ladies is very muddled. For the most part, Austen is disparaging of the sex shameful acts introduce in nineteenth century English society, especially with regards to marriage. She can voice this feedback through characters like Charlotte Lucas (who weds Collins since she needs security) and even Mrs. Bennet (who, however strange, is the just a single to stand in opposition to the entailment of Longbourn). Moreover, Austen’s mimicked depiction of the more youthful Bennet little girls is proof of her abhor for unimportant ladies. Her sentiment was maybe more in accordance with Mr. Bennet, Elizabeth, or even the dismal Mary. While Austen appears to acknowledge the impediments of her sex, she reprimands a general public that powers ladies to underscore their minimum complimenting attributes.
Works Citied
Spring, David. “Level of Rank.” Social Issues in Literature of Issues of Class in Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice. Edited by Claudia Durst Johnson. Published in Detroit: Christine Nasso, 2009. 42-50
Keymer, Thomas. “Rank and Human Relationships.” Social Issues in Literature of Issues of Class in Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice. Edited by Claudia Durst Johnson. Published in Detroit: Christine Nasso, 2009. 51-56
Monaghan, David. “Courtship and Class.” Social Issues in Literature of Issues of Class in Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice. Edited by Claudia Durst Johnson. Published in Detroit: Christine Nasso, 2009. 57-64
McAleer, John. “Morality and Social Distinctions.” Social Issues in Literature of Issues of Class in Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice. Edited by Claudia Durst Johnson. Published in Detroit: Christine Nasso, 2009. 65-73