Executive Summary
The Adidas Group is one of the largest sporting goods companies in the world and a leader in sustainability, consistently ranking in the ‘Global 100 Most Sustainable Corporations in the World.’ Despite this, the company has faced significant challenges, particularly regarding labor practices in its supplier factories in China and environmental issues raised by organizations like Greenpeace. Notably, in 2013, Greenpeace criticized Adidas for its association with Pt Gistex Group, a company found to be dumping toxic and hazardous chemicals into the Citarum River in West Java, Indonesia. This essay explores Adidas’s commitment to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), the challenges it faces, the actions it has taken, and potential strategies to enhance its CSR initiatives.
Introduction
The rise of globalization has been accompanied by significant economic, social, environmental, and political challenges. These challenges have sparked public discourse about the role of corporations in society, particularly in serving the public good. As companies expand globally, they often operate in countries with different, and generally lower, standards of living and labor practices than those in their domestic markets. This has led to increased scrutiny of corporate practices and the role of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in ensuring that businesses operate ethically and sustainably.
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD, 2016) defines CSR as the relationship between organizations and the societies in which they operate, emphasizing the need for companies to go beyond legal requirements for the betterment of the community. Similarly, the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX, 2016) refers to CSR as the management of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks for the benefit of organizations and their stakeholders. The United Nations, a strong advocate for human rights, underscores the moral obligation of companies to uphold, protect, and remedy human rights breaches. These definitions provide the framework for examining the importance of CSR in modern business practices.
Adidas: One of the Most Sustainable Companies in the World
Adidas, founded in 1949 by Adolf Dassler in post-war Germany, is a global multinational corporation headquartered in Herzogenaurach, Bavaria. The company designs and manufactures sportswear and accessories, competing closely with Nike for market dominance. Adidas’s commitment to sustainability has earned it recognition as one of the world’s most sustainable companies. However, this commitment has not been without challenges.
The globalization of large corporations like Adidas has led to increased operations in countries with lower standards of living and labor conditions, such as China. To gain a competitive advantage, Adidas has relied on suppliers in these regions, often leading to labor and environmental issues. For example, in 2008, a UK newspaper investigation revealed that workers in Adidas supplier factories in Fuzhou, China, faced discrimination, wage cheating, inadequate pay, and abusive working conditions. These issues were compounded by Adidas’s acquisition of Reebok, which brought additional supply chain challenges.
In addition to labor issues, Adidas has faced significant environmental challenges. Greenpeace’s 2012 report accused Adidas of contaminating water systems through chemical residues left on clothing sold to consumers worldwide. The report highlighted Adidas’s involvement with the PT Gistex Group, a company responsible for repeated contamination of the Citarum River in West Java, Indonesia. These issues underscore the importance of CSR in managing the social and environmental impacts of global supply chains.
Why Should Adidas Care About CSR?
The rise of CSR has put pressure on brands to respond to accusations of unethical practices. Activists have the right to help protect the planet against large organizations that may prioritize profit margins over environmental sustainability and ethical labor practices. With the rise of social media and the increasing trend of socially conscious consumers, companies like Adidas are more vulnerable to public protests, naming and shaming, boycotts, and demonstrations. These actions can have a significant negative impact on a brand’s reputation and financial performance.
As explained by Bob Willard, author of The New Sustainability Advantage: Seven Business Case Benefits of Triple Bottom Line, addressing environmental and social issues can give companies a competitive and substantial advantage over their competitors. Public awareness and concerns regarding environmental and social issues are increasing, and companies that fail to address these concerns may face financial repercussions.
Investing in CSR can have positive side effects, including increased brand recognition, improved worker retention and productivity, enhanced customer loyalty, and greater interest in the company’s stocks. On the other hand, some argue that CSR can be a distraction from a company’s primary goal of maximizing profits and shareholder value. However, in today’s business environment, where transparency and ethical practices are increasingly valued, CSR is becoming an essential component of long-term business strategy.
CSR Challenges and Adidas’s Response
Adidas has faced significant challenges in its CSR journey, but it has also made notable progress. The company has introduced several initiatives aimed at reducing its environmental impact, improving labor conditions, and increasing transparency in its supply chain. These initiatives include reducing emissions, minimizing water waste, and conducting regular inspections of supplier factories.
However, the effectiveness of these measures is still debated. While inspections and audits have led to improvements in some areas, challenges persist, particularly in ensuring compliance among all suppliers. For instance, while Adidas has made strides in reducing its environmental footprint, the company continues to face criticism for its association with suppliers that do not meet international labor standards.
Adidas’s commitment to transparency is evident in its regular publication of sustainability reports and its efforts to engage with stakeholders on CSR issues. These reports provide valuable insights into the company’s progress and challenges, helping to build trust with consumers and stakeholders. However, transparency alone is not enough; Adidas must also ensure that its CSR initiatives are effectively implemented and that suppliers are held accountable for their practices.
What Has Adidas Done to Address These Issues?
Adidas has taken several steps to address the CSR challenges it faces. The company has introduced policies to reduce its environmental impact, such as using more sustainable materials and investing in renewable energy sources. It has also increased transparency by regularly publishing sustainability reports and conducting third-party audits of its suppliers.
Despite these efforts, some critics argue that Adidas’s actions are insufficient to fully address the issues at hand. For instance, while inspections and audits have improved conditions in some factories, there are still reports of labor violations in others. To enhance its CSR impact, Adidas could consider adopting a more rigorous approach to supply chain management, including stronger enforcement mechanisms and greater involvement in local communities where its suppliers operate.
Recommendations for Further Improvement
If I were responsible for managing Adidas’s CSR strategy, I would prioritize the following actions:
- Enhanced Supply Chain Transparency: Increase transparency by publishing detailed reports on supplier performance and the specific actions taken to address any issues. This would build trust with consumers and stakeholders and demonstrate Adidas’s commitment to ethical practices.
- Stricter Supplier Accountability: Implement a zero-tolerance policy for suppliers that violate labor or environmental standards. This could include terminating contracts with non-compliant suppliers and publicly disclosing these actions to demonstrate a commitment to ethical practices.
- Community Engagement: Invest in local communities where suppliers operate by funding educational programs, healthcare initiatives, and environmental conservation efforts. This would help improve the quality of life for workers and reduce the likelihood of future violations.
- Collaborative Partnerships: Partner with NGOs, governments, and other stakeholders to develop industry-wide standards for labor practices and environmental sustainability. By leading these efforts, Adidas can position itself as a pioneer in CSR and set a benchmark for other companies to follow.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the rise of CSR has forced organizations to be more diligent in applying sustainable practices and innovating for the future. Adidas, despite facing significant challenges, has shown a commitment to improving its CSR efforts. However, there is still room for improvement, particularly in ensuring supplier compliance and increasing transparency. By taking a more proactive and collaborative approach, Adidas can enhance its CSR impact, improve its brand image, and contribute to a more sustainable global economy.
References
- Smith, N. (2003). Corporate Social Responsibility: Whether or How?. California Management Review, 45(4), pp.60-70.
- Fields, Z. (2016). Collective creativity for responsible and sustainable business practice. p.271.
- The Economist 2005, ‘Profit and the public good: Companies that merely compete and prosper make society better off’, The Economist, viewed on 28 July 2016, <http://www.economist.com/node/3555259>.
- Jhunjhunwala, S., 2014. Intertwining CSR with strategy–the way ahead. Corporate Governance, 14(2), pp.211-219.
- Willard, Bob. The Sustainability Advantage: Seven Business Case Benefits of a Triple bottom line. Gabriola Island, B.C.: New Society, 2002. Print.
- ASX 2016, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility’, ASX, viewed 20 September 2017, http://www.asx.com.au/about/corporate-social-responsibility.htm.
- Jhunjhunwala, S., 2014. Intertwining CSR with strategy–the way ahead. Corporate Governance, 14(2), pp.211-219.
- Les, A., & Mulvihill, M. J. (2012). Collaboration across disciplines for sustainability: Green chemistry as an emerging multistakeholder community. Environmental Science & Technology, 46(11), pp.5643-5649.
- OECD. (2016). OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. OECD Publishing.
- Adidas Group. (2017). FACTORY WORKERS: Workers in our suppliers’ factories play a central role in our sustainability programme. [online] Available at: https://www.adidas-group.com/en/media/news-archive/press-releases/2016/adidas-group-launches-new-sustainability-strategy-publishes-2015/ [Accessed 21 Sep. 2017].